Tonight, or I suppose technically last night - since it's 2:30 in the morning, I went out with a bunch of friends, Jackie and Fitzy included. We went to the bar that's almost immediately across the street. It's small and it's dirty, but it's entirely university students, the booze is cheap, and the music is loud. The booze thing isn't a big deal for me since I've kind of decided to go straight edge, but I'll talk about that another time.
We went as a group, meeting more people there, and for the most part it was a wonderful night. They played good music (it's kind of hit and miss there) and we danced up a storm. Fitzy played some interference for us on a couple of occasions, positioning himself between us and the intruding male, and proceeding to waggle his butt aggressively. There was dancing and singing and much fun.
And then there were two people, which we shall refer to as Dumb-Ass and Smarmy-Ass. DA decided that Jackie and I were the perfect target for his attention. He proceeded to get routinely up in our space, and obviously thought it was very funny when we elbowed/pushed/shoved him away. Fitzy tried to get him to back off, but it was to no avail. I heard him talking to his friend, Encouraging-Bastard, about how he was sure he could get one of us and EB could get the other. It was quite offensive, to say the least. At one point I got fed up and put my hand straight up in the air, which is the universal signal to the bouncers for attention. Unfortunately for me, it was seemingly unobserved. Then DA full out grabbed my butt, and when I shoved him off, he went over and grabbed Jackie and tried to grind with her. I was so angry at this point that I would have decked him if I could have gotten to him fast enough. Jackie moved, Fitzy repositioned himself once more, but DA kept moving around him to get to whichever one Fitzy wasn't blocking. I had had it. I went over to the closest bouncer, pointed out the guy, and they had him removed. Finished, right? Wrong!
DA's friend SA came over and started harassing Fitzy for getting DA thrown out. Fitzy just told him to watch his friend next time, and SA said that he wouldn't do anything "this time" but not to throw out one of his buddies again. SA left, and I told Fitzy that it's easier if I take the blame for getting guys kicked out, because they'll just call me a bitch, but they may very well throw a punch at a guy. At any rate, we stayed, unharassed for a while, and then as we got ready to go, SA came over again to talk to Fitzy, and I cut in front of Fitzy, looked the SA square in the eyes and said, "tell your buddy that next time, when a girl says 'no', to just back off". SA retorted with, "he was just joking", but I cut him off with a, "yeah, yeah, whatever" and we left.
He had the nerve to say something more to Fitzy when we were in line at the coat check, but I missed that part. We walked home, and by the time I got in my apartment and had sat down, I had pretty much stopped shaking with rage. Fitzy apologized for having to defend us, which, for the record Fitzy, is silly: you can't apologize for men, just because you happen to share their gender. We appreciated all the interference you ran.
Jackie raised a good point. It sucks that we have to have a guy in order to get other guys to back off. It's simply not enough any more to say "no thanks" or "girls night", they just get more aggressive. I used to, when a guy came on to my friend, say "hey man, quit hitting on my girlfriend", and they'd normally back right off. Now it seems like it's just encouraging to them, like they think that then they can get both of us (woo hoo lesbians). The only way, it seems, is to get another guy to tell them off. Fitzy normally just says "sorry man, she's taken" and the guy backs right off. Why can't they take the rejection from me? Do they assume that we're playing hard to get? That by the pushing away, the verbal shut downs, the moving away, and the angry looks, we're really saying, "try it again stud, and you'll get lucky"?
Obviously, the experience will depend on the bar you're in, the efficiency of the security staff, and the amount of alcohol that both parties have ingested, but still the question remains: When did 'no' start meaning 'maybe'?